 |
|
 |
 |
Planet of the Apes |
 |
• the
history: In 1963, Pierre Boulle published
his best-selling novel La Planéte
des Singes in France. Translated
Monkey Planet, the book became a
major motion picture just five years later. It
was of course called Planet of the
Apes. The groundbreaking sci-fi tale
starred Charlton Heston and was written in
part by Twilight Zone scribe Rod
Serling. A franchise was born. From there,
20th Century Fox released four sequels in four
years; Beneath the Planet of the Apes
(1970), Escape from the Planet of the
Apes (1971), Conquest of the Planet of
the Apes (1972) and Battle for the
Planet of the Apes (1973). An hour-long,
live-action TV series aired in 1974 followed by
a Saturday-morning cartoon in 1975. Action
figures. Plastic models. Lunch boxes. Board
games. Several years before George Lucas
and Star Wars revolutionized product
licensing, Planet of the Apes blazed its
own profitable trail. Now, 33 years after John
Chambers won an Oscar for makeup on the
original film, modern effects master Rick
Baker looks like the front-runner in this year’s
race for his work on what director Tim Burton
insists is not a remake or a sequel, but a
"re-imagining" of Boulle’s novel.
Prepare for toys, trading cards and lunch
boxes all over again. A franchise is
resurrected.
• the
story: As a member of the United States
Air Force, Captain Leo Davidson trains
chimpanzees to pilot shuttlecraft. The year is
2029. When one of his pupils disappears into
a swirling astronomical disturbance, Leo bolts
after the chimp, only to time warp through the
same vortex and crash land on a planet ruled
by talking apes. He is quickly captured along
with other humans (including the lovely
Daena) and sold to an orangutan slave trader
named Limbo, a cowardly opportunist who
provides the movie’s comic relief. A
sympathetic chimp named Ari, a senator’s
daughter who is basically an animal rights
activist in reverse (she opposes humans
being branded, kept as pets and having their
natural habitat destroyed) befriends Leo and
accompanies his troupe on a reconnaissance
mission. If he can retrieve an electronic gizmo
from his downed pod, he can reconnect with
his starship. The ragtag band is pursued by a
simian army led by Thade, a tyrannical fascist
who believes that (to borrow a line from 1968)
the only good human is a dead human. When
the Homo sapiens and beasts collide, there’s
no telling how it will ultimately affect planetary
history.
•
positive elements: Leo’s sense of
duty and friendship compel him to try and
rescue the chimp he’s training as a pilot
(though he deliberately disobeys orders and
puts his colleagues in danger as a result).
The selfless Ari shows kindness to humans
on numerous occasions, jeopardizing her
own social status in her narrow-minded
culture. Daena refuses to flee captivity without
her father and siblings. When Leo is tempted
to shoot Limbo, Ari advises him, "If you
kill him, you’ll only lower yourself to his
level." The film reminds us of the need to
be good stewards of our natural resources,
though in places it gets quite preachy about its
environmentalism. The more noble characters
decry the fact that cruelty is rewarded with
power, and dream of a day when both species
can peacefully coexist in an atmosphere of
respect. [Spoiler Warning] By the end,
that harmony does appear possible as Attar
decides to leave the graves of slain warriors in
the great conflict unmarked ("No one will
be able to tell apes from humans. They will be
mourned together as it should be").
•
spiritual content: Because the
movie’s spirituality and evolutionary theory are
so tightly interwoven, it makes sense to
discuss both here. Politically leveraged
primates debate whether or not humans have
souls. The presupposition throughout is that
apes somehow evolved from humans, who
are considered a much lower rung on the
evolutionary ladder. Ordinarily, this would be a
big concern, but in light of the time-travel
story’s wild twists and turns (especially the
very last one), the whole concept of men and
apes being anything but separately created
"kinds" collapses like a house of
cards. It gets pushed to illogical, laughable
limits. Reviewers have been asked not to
disclose certain revelations, so I won’t go into
detail. But trust me. Even sci-fi fans who
embrace the film on its own terms will
encounter gaping chasms of logic and wind
up shaking their heads at the scientific
hokum.
More subtle and disturbing to me is how
one gorilla’s sincere religious faith (a strange
hybrid of Christian and Eastern influences
shared by many of the primates) plays itself
out. Early on, Attar demands that his peers
bow their heads and say grace. He prays to a
"holy father" who is expected to
return and restore peace. The spiritual beast
is actually addressing Semos, who turns out
the be the father of apes, but not the divine
creator he thinks he is. As details of the
simians’ origin unfold, Attar’s faith turns out to
be part myth, part ignorance. He finally
concludes, "Everything I have believed is
a lie!" What remains is a spiritual
vacuum. All that’s left in this cinematic
universe is the circumstantial evolution of a
single species without concern or regard for
cosmic creation. And that’s okay with Burton
and Co. So not only does the script build on
the rickety foundation of macroevolution, but it
does so at the expense of orthodox
religion.
One last thought on this subject. It’s not
uncommon for secular filmmakers to
unwittingly play to the divine drama planted
within each of us by God. And this movie does
so. As Ari bids farewell to Leo, she says,
"Someday they will tell a story about a
human who came from the stars and changed
our world. And some will say it’s just a fairy
tale ..." Why does so much sci-fi hinge
on the heroics of otherworldly saviors? From
Superman to E.T., it appears
there’s a Christ-shaped hole audiences don’t
even know they have, and it’s being filled by
cleverly conceived substitutes. Of course, the
opportunity awaiting Christians is to draw
upon these cultural models to point fans of
fiction to the real Hero, Jesus.
•
sexual content: A little sexual tension
exists as Ari and Daena vie for Leo’s affection.
Just as a chimpanzee in a nightgown begins
to perform a wild mating dance for her
turned-on hubby, they are interrupted by
intruders.
•
violent content: While intense at times
(hence the film’s rating), most of the combat is
bloodless and much is left to the viewer’s
imagination. People are clubbed, whacked,
netted, tackled, beaten, kicked, punched and
have torches thrown at them by their hairy
oppressors. Primate children throw stones at
caged humans. Flesh is seared with a
branding iron. A ruthless military commander,
Thade viciously murders two of his own
soldiers in order to protect a secret. He also
slashes a man from behind. Another has his
neck snapped. A final battle between humans
and apes includes warriors being cut by
swords, run through with daggers and
(offscreen) stabbed with a sharp metal
helmet. Attar and Krull fight to the death. A
nuclear-powered blast decimates a legion of
ape soldiers. Very few guns appear in this
version of the sci-fi tale, but Leo and Thade
take several shots at each other (Thade gets
his weapon from his dad, an ape portrayed
with a touch of irony by National Rifle
Association president Charlton Heston).
•
crude or profane language: About a
dozen profanities—all h--- and d--n except for
several exclamatory uses of Jesus’
name.
•
drug and alcohol content: None until
the very end. Ever the opportunist, Limbo
discovers a bottle of pills and views it as a
chance to open a brand-new trade with young
humans ("OK kids, who wants to buy
some aspirin"). It’s obvious the
filmmakers (and the audience I sat with)
thought this joke about peddling dope to
children was a lot funnier than I did.
•
conclusion: This film is going to be
huge. Not only will it attract scores of young
males hungry for an adrenaline rush, but
racing toward the box-office ten strides ahead
of them will be their thirtysomething dads.
There’s a built-in curiosity for those whose
stomachs sank when, as adolescents
themselves, they watched a loinclothed
Charlton Heston encounter the ruins of Lady
Liberty. In fact, to appeal to those long-time
fans, a few key lines from the original film find
their way into this script (an homage that
comes off sounding rather silly).
On the whole, Burton’s
"re-imagining" of the story is
effective and entertaining. Its brisk pace and
impressive makeup get the job done, despite
shortcomings in the storytelling and a few
inconsistent performances. What pleased me
most was the restraint shown by director Tim
Burton, who has exhibited a disturbingly dark
side with films such as Sleepy Hollow,
Batman Returns, Beetlejuice, The Nightmare
Before Christmas and the maddeningly
mean-spirited Mars Attacks. Here, he
more than respects his PG-13 rating by
keeping language, graphic violence and
sexual material to a minimum. Yes, there’s
brutality, several misuses of the Lord’s name
and spiritual elements that warrant mature
discussion. Planet of the Apes is
definitely not for everyone. But if thoughtful
parents comfortable with what the franchise
produced 30 years ago choose to accompany
their older teens, this thrill-packed adventure
may bridge a generation gap and inspire
meaningful dialogue.
eNewsletter
Mobile
Magazine
|
 |