 |
|
 |
 |
Gangs of New York |
 |
WEB EDITOR'S
NOTE: This film contains graphic violence
and extreme sexual content. This review
references that content and is not appropriate
for children.
Martin Scorsese says he’s wanted to
create Gangs of New York for 30 years.
That was when he first read Herbert Asbury’s
1928 historical saga of the same name. The
film is loosely based on that book, and the
story that emerges is an engrossing and
terrible tale of war, hatred, lust and
revenge. The epic begins in 1846 with a street
war between Irish-Catholic immigrants and
Protestant New York "nativists." The
immigrants, led by a man known as Priest
Vallon, fight to carve out a piece of the new
world for themselves and for those who follow.
William "The Butcher" Cutting and his warriors
aim to fend off what they see as the invading
hordes. Both fight in the name of God. Both
fight for dignity and life.
That initial battle is won by The Butcher.
As Cutting’s knife takes Vallon’s life, and
scatters the immigrant mob, Vallon’s young
son (who later becomes known as
Amsterdam) watches every wound, soaking in
the malevolence that causes them. Sixteen
years later, after growing up in an orphanage
far from sight and out of mind, he arrives back
at the Five Points, bent on revenge. Known for
its sweltering night life, fast-fingered
pickpockets and lawless violence, the Five
Points serves as Cutting’s headquarters. To
get close to The Butcher, Amsterdam joins his
gang and works his way up to the status of
second-in-command. Then, on the
anniversary of his father’s death, he stages
his attack.
While Civil War rages in the South, and life
and death swirls through the Five
Points, love and lust grimly fight for
dominance under cover of night. Amsterdam
meets Jenny, a skilled pickpocket and
"turtledove" (a woman who dresses up as
a maid to steal from the rich), and the two
kindred spirits immediately begin
smooching and sparring. It’s his best friend,
Johnny, who is responsible for
introducing him to Cutting and his gang, but
turbulence lies ahead for the two
men as well. Ultimately, Amsterdam’s private
grudge match with Cutting is transcended
by the 1863 Civil War Draft Riots. And what
has seemed like such a monumental
issue throughout the story is submerged in a
hail of cannon fire. Laced with
as much character development as a Jeff
Shaara novel, Gangs bludgeons
sensibility while delicately tapping a wide
range of subconscious fears. The
themes are astonishingly human, the history
spectacular and more than little
frightening.
•
spiritual content: Faith in God (or at
least lip service to such a faith) fuels war as
Protestants and Catholics clash in the New
World just as they had in the Old. The Priest
and his men take communion before facing
off with The Butcher. Everyone prays
that God will bless their endeavors and scour
their enemies from the face of the earth.
Vallon teaches his son to pray to St. Michael,
who "cast Satan out of Paradise." Taunting
the
immigrants before a battle, Cutting yells, "Let
the Christian Lord guide my hand!" Vallon
retorts, "Prepare to receive the true
Lord!" Years later, after being exhorted by a
priest to forgive those who wronged him,
Amsterdam tosses his Bible into the river and
sets off to seek their death. After picking a
person’s pocket, Jenny is fond of smirking, "I
leave you in the grace and favor of the Lord."
When a preacher urges Amsterdam to come
to church, Amsterdam responds, "Go to h---."
One man credits Shakespeare for writing the
King James Bible. The Holy Spirit is said to
give men the courage to kill ("I’ve got the
steam of the Holy Spirit in my spine"). To indict
a politician for straddling the fence on
immigration issues, Cutting quotes
Revelation 3:16.
• nudity and sexual
content: Dances and drunken parties turn
into orgies of exhibitionism and public sex.
Classic statues of nude women are
displayed, but those stone ladies aren’t the
only ones who are naked. Bare-breasted
women (many of them prostitutes) are seen
dancing, being groped and having sex.
Completely nude, two women cuddle
together on a bed while Cutting watches. In
another scene, two nude women drape
themselves over Cutting. Amsterdam has sex
with Jenny (she isn’t nude, but the depiction
of their activity is graphic).
Worse, their intercourse is preceded by an
angry altercation. Later, Cutting
sneaks into their room and watches the two
sleeping. When Amsterdam wakes up,
Cutting make a vulgar reference about them
having had oral sex. A man dressed
as a woman lines up with the rest of the
ladies at a dance.
•
violent content: The violence in
Gangs of New York is so pervasive and
graphic that to itemize it all would be at best
nauseating. What struck me throughout the
nearly 3-hour film was that nearly every social
gathering triggered some sort of brawl or riot.
Various police forces fight one another more
than they fight crime. Competing fire
departments battle each other while untended
buildings blaze beside them. Dances turn into
dirges as dead bodies pile up. Politicians
make public speeches, and if someone
doesn’t like what they have to say, they murder
them in the doorways of their own homes.
Blood flows thick on the cobblestone streets
as flesh is pummeled with axes, spears,
knives, clubs, bullets and bricks. Dozens of
scenes include gore. One, so extreme I’m
compelled to mention it only in the broadest
strokes, shows The Butcher ripping a man’s
intestines from his belly and dumping them
on the floor. Arms are severed. Bones broken.
Throats slit. Skulls split. Chests impaled.
Cannon fire decimates buildings, kills
hundreds of people and sets large sections of
the city on fire (the billowing smoke that covers
Manhattan sends shivers up and down your
spine). Four men are executed in a public
hanging. More than once, a knife that is
plunged into a man’s gut is twisted and turned
to cause as much damage as possible. A
dead man is hung on a makeshift cross for
passersby to see. Amsterdam’s face is
branded with a red-hot knife blade.
•
crude or profane language: Six
f-words (one of them used to reference sex)
and one s-word. A dozen milder profanities
are all but drowned out in the din, but the
same number of profane uses of the Lord’s
name stand out starkly (seven or eight times,
characters abuse the names "Jesus" and
"Christ").
•
drug and alcohol content: Drinking is
common. Several scenes are shot in pubs
and at wild parties. Amsterdam and others in
Cutting’s gang smoke an unnamed drug from
a long pipe. Amsterdam and Cutting smoke
cigars and pipes. Others smoke cigarettes.
• other negative
elements: Men wager on everything from
brutal
boxing matches to animal fights. When
Vallon is about to die, he holds his young
son’s head in his hands and forces him to
watch as Cutting turns the knife in
his gut. One of the men who is hanged calls
out to his watching son and entreats
him to watch. Both of these scenes are used
to communicate an intense commitment
to avenging loved one’s deaths, a mission
Amsterdam devotes his life to. In
contrast, God tells us that vengeance is His,
and that we are to trust Him with
our lives and with our death (Romans 12:19).
Racism rears its ugly head repeatedly
in the film. Epithets are hurled against
Blacks, Chinese and other immigrants.
Such sentiments and the cruel behavior it
inspires aren’t condoned in the story;
neither are they condemned. They just
are. Politicians set a disturbing
example, clinging to popularity and power
rather than truth and ethics. "The
appearance of the law must be upheld,"
declares one such man of considerable
sway, "especially while it is being broken."
Citizens are forced to vote (sometimes
more than once, and at the point of a knife)
for the candidate with the most
devoted henchmen.
•
conclusion: Oddly enough, Gangs
of New York was shot in Rome. The
ancient streets and teetering tenements found
there made a perfect backdrop for 19th century
New York. "We cocooned ourselves in this
little environment," Leonardo DiCaprio said.
"We woke up every day and went on set and
went back in time." That commitment to
authenticity and realism radiates from every
nook and cranny of the film. As Daniel
Day-Lewis is apt to do, he completely loses
himself in his role as The Butcher. It’s one of
his most distinctive roles yet, and he’s had a
lot of them. DiCaprio has fully rebounded from
his Titanic slump, giving Amsterdam
layers of complexity and conflicted nuance.
He’s at his best when tormented by the fact
that his desire for revenge is softening under
an inscrutable affection for his enemy. "I’ve
been taken under the wing of the dragon,"
Amsterdam mutters. "And I’ve found it to be
surprisingly warm."
The history lesson proffered here is well
taken. I’ll leave its accuracy for
the historians to debate, and suffice it to say
that I walked away more grateful
than ever for my cushy 21st century life.
What’s missing from New York in 1863
is the rule of law. And that makes all the
difference. Today we thrive in a
society governed by law and order to be
envied by all other countries, and this
movie makes one immensely grateful for
that. If the actual events of Civil War
New York were only one-fifth as
frightening as what emanates from
Scorsese’s
imagination, not many of us would dare wish
its return.
What’s not so well taken is the level of
brutality and sexual arousal shown openly and
enthusiastically onscreen. Its violence puts
Gangs in the same league as
Saving Private Ryan, Black Hawk Down,
We Were Soldiers and Windtalkers.
Some of its viciousness actually surpasses
that of such modern war movies because it is
so intensely gruesome, with knives and clubs
getting more close-up screen time than
bullets and bombs. Likewise, its nudity and
sexual activity teeter just shy of NC-17 territory.
This is as far from a PBS documentary as
Scorsese could possibly get. He’s proud of
that, but it makes his long-awaited vision of
the past inaccessible to millions of families in
the present who, preferring not to risk
psychological desensitization, keep their
appetites for destruction in check.
|
 |