 |
|
 |
 |
E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial |
 |
Originally released in the summer of 1982,
Steven Spielberg’s classic sci-fi
heart-tugger is celebrating its 20th
anniversary by returning to theaters with
enhanced visual effects, never-before-seen
footage and a re-mastered soundtrack.
A young boy named Elliott, coping with his
parents’ recent separation, makes
a new friend when a stranded extra-terrestrial
wanders into his backyard. With
the help of his older brother Michael and little
sister Gertie, Elliott tries
to keep E.T. a secret—especially from
grownups—while making the creature feel
at home. But "home" is where the
heartlight is, and E.T. misses his
glowing family. The alien falls ill and into the
hands of scary government scientists,
only to be rescued by his friend and taken (on
flying bicycles) to rendezvous
with his space ship.
•
about the changes: Most of the
filmmakers’ tinkering is subtle enough to go
virtually unnoticed. A sharper print. A more
vivid score. The story is exactly the same,
though a couple of scenes (your basic DVD
bonus material) were rescued from the cutting
room floor and reinstated. The most
noteworthy addition is one in which E.T.
explores the family bathroom. Cute moments
include emptying a tube of toothpaste,
sneezing, getting sprayed by a can of soda
and toppling into a bathtub (there’s brief
concern that the alien may be drowning, but all
ends well). Another "new"
sequence involves Mary driving through what
looks like a suburban riot zone to locate her
trick-or-treating children.
What’s more impressive than the added
scenes is how computer-generated special
effects take E.T. to another level of
authenticity without drawing undue attention to
themselves. They range from lights on the
space ship to more natural movements and
facial expressions by E.T. And in the roadblock
scene, Spielberg, bothered by the notion of
men brandishing guns to deal with innocent
kids, has even replaced the FBI’s shotguns
with walkie-talkies—one of several PC
tweaks.
One might think that odd jobs such as
helming Jurassic Park, Schindler’s List,
Amistad, A.I.: Artificial Intelligence and
Saving Private Ryan might have kept
the director busy enough over the past two
decades to close the book on E.T., one
of the most successful box-office hits of all
time. Not at all. "I’ve seen the film many
times on videotape with my kids as they grew
up, and I would always flinch at technical flaws
that perhaps only I noticed," Spielberg
explains. "For example, I always wanted
to fix E.T.’s run at the beginning of the film
when Keys is chasing him, because he was
simply an outline of E.T. on a rail with his
heartlight moving through some weeds."
Now E.T. makes a mad dash through the
forest, bounding along with an almost simian
rhythm.
Spielberg’s partner, producer Kathleen
Kennedy, agrees that advanced computer
technology led to this reissue. "We were
remembering things like, ‘Remember that day
when E.T.’s lip got caught and we were never
able to fix it for the shot?’ . . . The key to these
creative changes was Steven’s proviso that he
wanted these enhancements to really
assimilate into what people remember about
this movie."
That artistic restraint is most colorfully
articulated in an analogy by Industrial Light
& Magic’s Bill George. "It’s kind of
like the difference between sending grandma
to the beauty parlor, or sending her to the
plastic surgeon," he says. "We
wanted to send grandma to the beauty parlor,
because she’s someone you love. You don’t
want to change her, just make her more
attractive." For the record, grandma’s
looking better than ever!
•
positive elements: Elliott and E.T.
develop a deep friendship. The boy exhibits
patience and kindness as he gently lures the
alien into his room and proceeds to explain
his world. Michael, Elliott and Gertie give each
other a hard time, yet there’s the sense that
they really do love each other. The proof lies in
the way they pull together to support one
another as they help E.T. It’s also good to see
a peace-loving alien visit earth again (in recent
years, Hollywood has shifted toward violent
invasion films like Independence Day
and the mean-spirited Mars Attacks).
Reading from a children’s story, Mary shares
the section in which Tinkerbell nobly drinks
poison intended for her friend, Peter Pan. The
movie alludes to the power of entertainment
as a teaching tool when E.T. learns about
interstellar communication from a comic strip
and spends hours in front of the television set
soaking in Western culture. Elliott exhibits
conviction and compassion when he frees a
group of frogs destined to be dissected in
science class. References to the parents’
separation (and the dad’s dating exploits)
indicate how destructive divorce is to families.
In fact, Spielberg says of the film, "I
always wanted to tell the story of a child’s
reaction to his parents splitting up when he’s
still only about 10 years old, and how it
impacts the rest of his life. . . . It was a
childhood dream of a special friend who
rescues a boy from the sadness of
divorce."
•
spiritual content: Older boys interact
over a fantasy role-playing game akin to
Dungeons and Dragons that involves
"throwing spells" (mentioned, not
shown). The film’s ambiguous spirituality
could be read a couple of ways. On one level,
the idea of a special friend coming from
above, healing hurts, connecting with us at an
emotional level, dying, rising from the dead,
bidding farewell to his friends and returning to
the heavens should sound familiar to
Christians. For years I’ve used this parallel of
events in the life of Christ as a prime example
of how secular entertainment can
unintentionally borrow from the divine drama
of the Gospel. However, scenes in which
E.T.’s feelings are essentially being
"channeled" by Elliott are strange
at best. And when E.T. gets ill, so does Elliott
("We’re sick . . . I think we’re
dying").
•
sexual content: None, though male
anatomy factors into crass name-calling
between brothers.
•
violent content: Mild violence includes
neighborhood mischief at Halloween (lighting
fires, TP-ing houses, egging cars). Several
costumes are a bit gruesome, such as
Michael’s fake
"knife-through-the-head."
•
crude or profane language: Several
crude expressions, five profanities (including
two s-words) and a half-dozen exclamations
of "oh my god."
•
drug and alcohol content: When we
first meet Michael and his friends, several are
smoking cigarettes. E.T. downs a six-pack of
beer, which not only results in his
drunkenness, but makes Elliott tipsy as
well.
•
other negative elements: This
"kid empowerment flick" sends
some subtle messages parents may wish to
address. First, adults are antagonists not to
be trusted (even Mom isn’t brought in on the
E.T. secret until he’s too sick for the boys to
handle on their own). Second, although Mary
is a new single mom who obviously loves her
three children, it’s clear that the inmates are
running the asylum in that home. Kids rule.
They’re smarter and more savvy than their
elders. Elsewhere, Michael and his teenage
friends gamble on a role-playing game.
Dishonest or illegal behaviors are deemed
acceptable when the ends justify the means
(Elliott lies about being sick so he can skip
school; the kids deceive Mom; Michael steals
an ambulance and drives without a license,
etc.). Very young viewers may be spooked by
tense encounters early in the film (Elliott
tracking a mysterious intruder in the dark) and
frenzied chases near the end. They may also
have a harder time handling E.T.’s sickness
and apparent death.
•
conclusion: I first met the little brown
guy with the glowing finger in June of ’82, just
as I was graduating from high school. I
remember the theater I went to. The girl I was
dating. And how both of us couldn’t wait to see
the movie again with our parents. It was
a magical time and E.T. was part of it.
So it’s possible that my memories of the film
are a bit idealized. At least, that’s what I
thought before attending a screening of the
20th Anniversary Edition. The crowd
(mostly adults) was enraptured by it. Had they
all graduated that summer? Were they
all dating a cute underclassman?
Maybe, but odds are each had his or her own
reasons for being moved by revisiting the
tender boy-and-his-alien story. Keep in mind,
there was no home video in 1982. And
summer blockbusters had yet to become
prefab spectacles long on special effects and
short on heart. So perhaps some
across-the-board romantic attachment is
understandable. But baby boomers eager to
share that theatrical experience (richly
enhanced and beautifully restored) with young
children should use caution. Some
content—profanity in particular—may not be
quite as ideal as they remember it. Those
moments notwithstanding, E.T. The
Extra-Terrestrial is an enduring,
out-of-this-world fantasy that’s still fun 20
years later.
eNewsletter
Mobile
Magazine
|
 |